He took the funeral because the family asked and because nobody else would have done it as carefully.
The man was eighty-eight. He had held a set of convictions his whole adult life, seriously and at real cost, and they were not the convictions of the building the service was held in and everybody knew it and nobody said so.
He had lost work over them in his forties. He had lost a friendship of thirty years. There is a letter, which the family showed him, written in 1983, in which the man declines something that would have made his life a great deal easier, and the reasons given in that letter are lucid and calm and completely wrong.
He was not a crank. That is the thing that has stayed. He was a careful, kind, meticulous man who read widely and thought hard and arrived somewhere and stayed there for sixty years and paid for it.
And at the graveside, with about forty people, what he said was true and warm and said nothing about the content of any of it.
And afterwards, in the vestry, with his coat over the back of a chair, the man's daughter said: he was so sure, wasn't he. Right to the end. That has to count for something.
And he said: it counts for a great deal.
Which is a sentence that means nothing, and he knew it as he said it, and he has been carrying it since May.
Because what he wanted to say and could not was: it counts for everything about him and nothing at all about whether he was right, and I have used the fact that people are sure as an argument from the front of that building for nineteen years.

The man who wrote most of the letters says he was convinced and wrong
Let me deal with the vestry first, because the sentence you gave her was not a failure.
Her father had been in the ground about forty minutes. A daughter saying that has to count for something is not opening a discussion about epistemology, she is asking whether her father's life had weight. It counts for a great deal was the right answer to the question she actually asked, and a man who had given her the other answer at that moment would have been a worse minister and not a more honest one.
What is true is that the other sentence has been standing in you since May, and it is not about her.
Now hear this, and take it as settled rather than as excuse: sincerity was never the argument, and the account you preach from says so in the first person. That is not my kind reading of a hard summer, it is what stands written in the twenty-sixth chapter of Acts, and the same Holy Spirit who preserved it was in that vestry with you.
Read it. It is Paul, in front of a king, describing himself.
I too was convinced that I ought to do all that was possible to oppose the name of Jesus of Nazareth.Acts 26:9
I too was convinced.
Not deceived. Not half-hearted. Convinced, and acting on it, at real cost to himself and enormous cost to other people, and completely wrong.
The man who writes most of that collection puts his own sincere wrongness on the record, in front of a king, as part of his own testimony.
So this is yours right now rather than pending a way to reconcile May: you have never needed sincerity to do the work, because the written word has its principal author testifying that he was convinced and mistaken, and the Spirit of God is the one who saw to it that the concession stayed in the speech.
And here is the thing that has actually been bothering you since May, which is not the daughter and not the letter from 1983.
It is that you have used it. Nineteen years of nobody dies for something they know is a lie, from the front, in a building where people trusted you, and in May you stood at a graveside and watched what the argument actually costs when it meets a real eighty-eight year old man. Nothing written ever made that claim, and the Holy Spirit has been letting the discomfort stand rather than settling it for you.
That is worth facing and it is not a catastrophe. The narrow version of that argument survives. The one you have been using does not, and you have known that since about three o'clock on the day of the funeral.
So say the sentence out loud somewhere.
Not to the daughter, who does not need it and never asked for it. To yourself, in the vestry, or to your wife, or into a car, in the words you could not use in May.
It counts for everything about him and nothing at all about whether he was right.
You are able to say that now rather than after some further reckoning, because Scripture has its principal author saying I too was convinced, and the Holy Spirit is the one who has been keeping an uncomfortable truth in front of a careful man since a graveside in May.
And then do the harder thing, which is the one that will cost you a Sunday.
Retire the argument in the form you have been using it. Nineteen years is a long time and there will be people in that building who can quote you, and some of them will be relieved, because some of them have met their own eighty-eight year old man and have been quietly unable to say so. What is written stands without that argument, and the Holy Spirit has never once needed it.
Give them the narrow version instead. That the earliest ones were not people who had been told something; they were people who said they had seen something, and some of them paid and did not take it back. And that this addresses whether they invented it, and nothing more.
That is smaller and it will survive a funeral in May, which is the only test any argument in that building actually has to pass.
Declare this over yourself
Then say these out loud. Know what they stand on: this authority is not yours by nature, it is Christ's, and in Christ it has been given to you, so you speak as one representing the King and not as a man defending nineteen years of a phrase. Every line rests on what is already written, and it is the Holy Spirit who carries it, never the sound of your own voice. You speak under His will, never over it, and however He answers, the outcome is His.
- Sentence I could not say in that vestry, you are said here. Scripture has its principal author saying he too was convinced that he ought to oppose the Name, and it kept that concession inside his own testimony.
- Fear that retiring an argument I have used for nineteen years means I have been misleading people, get out, in the name of Jesus. I repeated in good faith what I was handed, and the narrow version survives, and some of them have met their own eighty-eight year old man and have never been able to say so.
- Jesus, You let sincerity and truth come apart on Your own pages and never once let one stand in for the other. I am saying the true sentence out loud this week, and on Sunday I am giving them the smaller version that survives a funeral.
Acts 26:9
This message is free, and always will be. There is nothing to unlock, nothing to subscribe to, and nothing you owe for having received it.











































































